Shrinking law firm ownership is an old tradition
The arithmetic potential to improve a firm’s PPEP by reducing the number of equity partners at that firm is obvious and significant. But it’s far from a new trend. Firms have been thinning their ownership ranks for over 20 years. In FY1990, Am Law 100 equity partners constituted 32.8% of all Am Law 100 lawyers. By FY2000, that metric declined to 27.5%. And by FY2011, it was down to 22.3%.
As legal industry metric wonks know, Am Law’s leverage metric also measures the extent of law firm ownership, but is calculated differently – as the ratio of all non-owner lawyers to each owner lawyer (equity partner). In FY1990, the Am Law 100 collective leverage was 2.05 to 1. In FY2000, it was 2.63 to 1. And in FY2011, it was 3.49 to 1.
How low will law firm equity partnership ranks go?
I’ll confidently predict that if nothing happens to modify this trend, by FY2020 equity partners will constitute no more than 18% of Am Law 100 lawyers. Stated another way, in FY2020 the Am Law 100 lawyer population will have at least 4.56 non-owner lawyers for every equity partner.
If those predictions take away your breath, consider the accounting firms: In FY2011, leverage at the Big Four was already 10.6 to 1, as reported by Accounting News Report.
Some uses of this competitive intelligence
As ow iHow you absorb the above information and patterns, consider their import to your firm’s and your competitors’ choices about growth, management and business development models. For instance:
1. How will this continuing trend of shrinking firm ownership affect your firm?
2. How will this trend impact your firm’s efforts to increase equity partner diversity?
3. What unintended consequences might this trend precipitate?
4. To what extent have specific firms’ PPEP been “enhanced” through rapidly shrinking ownership ranks?
5. When you factor out those PPEP “enhancements,” how do you interpret individual firms’ actual performances?
6. Put another way, which firms are truly pulling away from the pack, and which are simply leveraging the power of arithmetic?
7. Between now and 2020, what new business models might your firm or some of your competitor firms create to differentiate themselves and go to market more effectively?
8. How could you compete effectively against those new models?
As Am Law releases more early FY2012 firm results, I’ll be discussing them here.